Animal Communication

Animal Communication is a rapidly advancing field, incorporating medical intuitive skills, telepathy, awareness of foods and supplements, and a broad range of colleagues in related fields. Includes skills, recipes, home treatment tips, how to talk to your vet about this, etc.

For Nicole and her Kitty Girl who died today

BonnyDoon_to_Brigadoon (c)Denise Schultz 2010I am so sorry Kitty Girl,
that you had to die,
so young, so sud­denly
and I’m so grate­ful that I got to spend your dying moments with you
and some more time as you were in spirit while we said good­bye
to your still so beau­ti­ful
and still warm body.

Your beauty was mag­nif­i­cent,
so present,
even in death.

And Nicole was so present,
alive to her grief and her love for you,
deny­ing noth­ing, crush­ing noth­ing,
so alive to the whole­ness of love
even in the midst of los­ing you.

She will be such a good nurse,
such a good woman, a cat mother and mother
She is such a good per­son right now, already.

She is so open to her core
to what is real and true
to love and life
and death.

Her ques­tions about spir­i­tu­al­ity,
her doubts,
all are part of the grow­ing whorl of leaves
that leads out from her cen­ter,
Hon­est doubts.

But she heard you purring
after you were gone,
and I said, “That’s real.“
That’s not just a mem­ory.
That is your Kitty Girl com­ing to you
to tell you she is alright now,
and she loves you, loves you, loves you,
as you love her.

Thank you so much,
for the chance to be with you both today,
to be blessed by your purity of spirit,
and the love in your heart,
in your mind, in your being.
Thank you.

© Denise Schultz 2010

Dona­tions and con­nec­tions from the many to each other,
in even a tiny way, can cre­ate big shifts.

So please share Con­sider This . . .
with any­one else whom you want to con­sider these con­nec­tions and insights.

Share

Tags: , , ,

I was recently pub­lished on the excel­lent Paw­sTalk forum for ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tors, under the sec­tion Inter­views With Pro­fes­sional Communicators.

Hats off to Lisa, the big Caat at Spir­it­Caat, for her excel­lent ques­tions. The inter­view is repro­duced below, and if you want to check out her excel­lent board and other ser­vices, give her a click!

How do you describe ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tion to those who are unfa­mil­iar with what it is?

Ani­mals com­mu­ni­cate with each other in many ways, includ­ing telepa­thy. That is their native lan­guage, and how ani­mals of dif­fer­ent species can com­mu­ni­cate with each other. Humans can also use telepa­thy. We are trained to ignore it while quite young, in favor of ver­bal lan­guage. But it is pos­si­ble to regain our aware­ness and stop block­ing it out. I have spent a lot of time doing this, but it can also hap­pen in an instant, for any­one, with­out training.

What tips would you give to stu­dents of ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tion who are just start­ing out?

  • I am answer­ing these remarks in a way that often assumes you are pros and that you are work­ing, get­ting paid, etc. I know this is not nec­es­sar­ily the case, but I want you to feel what it is like to approach ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tion pro­fes­sion­ally. It is good for the ani­mals and for you, to see it this way.

  • Take a Reiki class. This is the best way I know to increase your sen­si­tiv­ity and aware­ness to energy. It will help you to rec­og­nize telepa­thy, and give you a heal­ing skill you can use in your com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Find some­one who will teach the three lev­els sep­a­rately, with time in-​​between lev­els to assim­i­late your heal­ing skills and to prac­tice with humans and ani­mals. Don’t set­tle for some­one who teaches two or three lev­els in one or two week­ends. That is a dis­ser­vice to Reiki, to the ani­mals, and to you.

  • We are not just trans­la­tors. We can do a lot more with our sen­si­tive, car­ing insight than just trans­late. Inter-​​species coun­sel­ing skills are very valu­able, and two of the best places I know to study are with Pene­lope Smith (www​.ani​maltalk​.net) and Dr. Jeri Ryan (www​.assisian​i​mals​.org/). Also, not all coun­sel­ing skills are gained in cer­ti­fi­ca­tion or train­ing. Spir­i­tual coun­sel­ing is at the cen­ter of many com­mu­ni­ca­tion prac­tices. You will need to explore this in your own life, not just with your teach­ers and mentors.

  • Start or increase your med­i­ta­tion prac­tice. Don’t freak out! This is EASY! You can use Google shop­ping to find a med­i­ta­tion CD which uses “bin­au­ral beat” encod­ing. That means that you will wear head­phones, and the sounds deliv­ered to the two ears will be dis­tinct from each other. Bin­au­ral beat med­i­ta­tion auto­mat­i­cally cre­ates theta brain­waves (deep med­i­ta­tion) by the rela­tion between the two dif­fer­ent sounds reach­ing the two hemi­spheres of your brain. Some brand names are Hemi­Sync (which holds the orig­i­nal patent) and Holo­Sync, and many other ver­sions are avail­able; I espe­cially like the ones with nature sounds. We have been cul­tur­ally trained that med­i­ta­tion is dif­fi­cult to do and that it’s hard to main­tain a sched­ule of it. Nei­ther is true. Bin­au­ral beat med­i­ta­tion is a tech­nol­ogy which deliv­ers med­i­ta­tion to us. Once you begin to expe­ri­ence the ben­e­fits, it is not so hard to com­mit to the sched­ule. Med­i­ta­tion is help­ful for fine-​​tuning your aware­ness, and for your well-​​being and abil­ity to deliver com­mu­ni­ca­tion on demand when nec­es­sary. Lis­ten to the CD once a day if pos­si­ble. It is impor­tant not to only lis­ten to it just before you go to sleep. Theta brain­waves are either deep med­i­ta­tion or lighter sleep. If you are too tired, you will sleep instead of med­i­tat­ing. Many peo­ple will fall asleep some­time dur­ing the CD, but if you are awake at least part of the time, you will get the ben­e­fits of the med­i­ta­tion and not just the sleep.

  • Find a men­tor. They may be an ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tor, a vet, a priest, or that old lady you always meet at the store. It’s up to you to attract the right per­son for you. This is some­one who will help you to achieve depth in your work. What­ever your native skills already are, they will add new facets to your awareness.

  • As soon as you can, con­sider charg­ing for your work. It helps clients to take you seri­ously, and they put more into the ses­sion in order to get more out of it. Also things that increase your sense of pro­fes­sion­al­ism are good for you and good for the field. You can start with a lower price, or work by dona­tion if you wish.

  • And sav­ing the best for last, my num­ber one tip is: work with ani­mals whom you don’t already know! This is sur­pris­ing for many peo­ple, who assume they will do best with ani­mals in their own fam­ily. Not true! With our own ani­mal fam­ily we have an inher­ent bias, because we are stake­hold­ers. We want Skippy to eat his din­ner in the kitchen and not drag it onto the rug, or Bella to stop hunt­ing birds in the back yard. That is not the place to start. Those are advanced nego­ti­a­tions, because we are fam­ily. Would an MD start to do surgery on their own fam­ily? No! In my ani­mal fam­ily, when things get seri­ous, I call another com­mu­ni­ca­tor. If you start by try­ing to prac­tice with your own ani­mal fam­ily, you may never find out how good you really are. It is sim­i­lar when work­ing with friends’ ani­mals whom you know pretty well. Espe­cially as a begin­ner, it is much harder to dif­fer­en­ti­ate between your ratio­nal mind and your intu­itive aware­ness when it is some­one you know ahead of time. So give your­self a break and try com­mu­ni­cat­ing with ani­mals you don’t know that well. Where there is an absence of ratio­nal knowl­edge about the sit­u­a­tion, the ‘still small voice’ of your intu­ition can be heard more easily.

Can you share some ver­i­fi­able ques­tions to ask the ani­mals for peo­ple just start­ing out?

I believe pur­su­ing ver­i­fi­able ques­tions, espe­cially at the begin­ning, is the wrong direc­tion to go. We want to build relax­ation, for our­selves, the clients, and espe­cially for the ani­mals. Relax­ation cre­ates open­ness to the infor­ma­tion that is already there.

Have you ever asked some­one a direct ques­tion and they answer about some­thing else entirely? The doc­tor might ask you, ‘how is your hand’? And you don’t really care about your hand, you’re really wor­ried about this mole on your face — is it a skin can­cer? So you start talk­ing about the mole. Imag­ine that most ani­mals may never have had the oppor­tu­nity for a real com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Now that they have your full atten­tion, maybe they don’t want test ques­tions, maybe they want to talk!

I find that ver­i­fi­ca­tion comes much more eas­ily in the course of an unstruc­tured con­ver­sa­tion. For exam­ple, I would never have thought to ask a cat, ‘how many water bowls do you have, and where are they’, but dur­ing the course of the com­mu­ni­ca­tion, he reveals that he has three bowls, and with each of them he has to turn his back to foot traf­fic. He would rather his peo­ple moved the bowls away from the wall, so he could have his back to the wall, and not worry that some­one is going by his tail while he’s drink­ing. The client was amazed at the level of ver­i­fi­able detail, but the quest was not for ver­i­fi­ca­tion, it was for what the cat needed. This cat was hav­ing kid­ney prob­lems, and mak­ing drink­ing eas­ier for him was very important.

Really, I believe that in all com­mu­ni­ca­tion the ani­mal is more impor­tant than our human effort to improve or ver­ify our skill as com­mu­ni­ca­tors. If we just put the ani­mal first, it all goes so much bet­ter, for every­one! If you con­duct a ‘nor­mal’ con­ver­sa­tion (rather than directly pur­su­ing ver­i­fi­ca­tion), much ver­i­fi­able infor­ma­tion will arise, with­out the tense strug­gle to be right, and get a tele­pathic ‘hit’.  [Please click the link to part 2 “More” of this arti­cle below the dona­tion button.]

© Denise Schultz 2010

Dona­tions and con­nec­tions from the many to each other,
in even a tiny way, can cre­ate big shifts.

So please share Con­sider This . . .
with any­one else whom you want to con­sider these con­nec­tions and insights.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Note: This arti­cle orig­i­nally appeared on Spirit Caat’s cat board.

Dear Caat,

It is not nec­es­sar­ily bad to be a guardian rather than an owner, except that it is a dilu­tion of the legal rela­tion­ship. I am not a lawyer, but as I under­stand it, the dif­fi­culty is when does the state (the gov­ern­ment) get to step in?

Because the AVMA can pull a vet’s license (sim­i­lar to the sanc­tion process for pulling the license of an MD, a process I am some­what famil­iar with) they are act­ing as the state in that case. The gov­ern­ment, in effect, says only vets know enough about vet­eri­nary prac­tice to reg­u­late each other, so we’ll put the pro­fes­sional asso­ci­a­tion in charge of when a vet gets to prac­tice, or when they have screwed up so much that they don’t get to prac­tice any­more. (I know this might seem like a tan­gent, but please bear with me.)

If we are only the guardians, and not the own­ers, of our ani­mal com­pan­ions, we do not have the same pre­sump­tion of our right to make choices about their care. A guardian is not pre­sumed to be as informed as the vet, for instance. So not only does the vet trump the guardian, but the pro­fes­sional vet asso­ci­a­tion is try­ing to trump alter­na­tive modal­i­ties out of all prac­tice (by both vets and non-​​vets) by defin­ing it as not good vet­eri­nary prac­tice, and not good for the animal.

[Please read more of this arti­cle by click­ing the link below the dona­tion button.]

© Denise Schultz 2010

Dona­tions and con­nec­tions from the many to each other,
in even a tiny way, can cre­ate big shifts.

So please share Con­sider This . . .
with any­one else whom you want to con­sider these con­nec­tions and insights.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , ,

Dear Caat,

The basis they are using is that all alter­na­tive care is ille­gal, because

  • it is only legal for a DVM vet to treat an ani­mal, and

  • they are so allo­path­i­cally con­ser­v­a­tive that they believe DVM vets should have their licenses pulled for par­tic­i­pat­ing in alter­na­tive care.

The AVMA is far more con­ser­v­a­tive than the AMA because the AMA has at least had to accept the human patient’s right to choose their own care, while the AVMA is using a legal stance sim­i­lar to ‘in loco par­en­tis’, where they avow that only the vet can make a choice about an animal’s care, and the client only has a right to choose alter­na­tive care if they can find a vet to agree with them. ‘In loco par­en­tis’ is what a col­lege is bound by to be legally respon­si­ble for minor stu­dents. The AVMA is say­ing that since ani­mals are not human, only a vet is qual­i­fied to make deci­sions for their care, and to admin­is­ter that care. All alter­na­tive prac­tice would be ille­gal, even for vets. It’s pretty fascist.

[Please read more of this arti­cle by click­ing the link below the dona­tion button.]

© Denise Schultz 2009

Dona­tions and con­nec­tions from the many to each other,
in even a tiny way, can cre­ate big shifts.

So please share Con­sider This . . .
with any­one else whom you want to con­sider these con­nec­tions and insights.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , , ,

Is it real? Yes, it is real. Ani­mals have told me phys­i­cal things that were con­firmed by X-​​rays, ultra­sounds, blood tests, and man­ual pal­pa­tion by vets, chi­ro­prac­tors, acu­puncturists, and oth­ers. Anatom­i­cal charts help me name phys­i­cal things the ani­mals show me, so the client can ask the vet about it. Things ani­mals have told me about life events, phys­i­cal objects in their envi­ron­ment, lay­out of house and land­scape, etc., have been con­firmed by clients.

What about proof? The best proof is for me to work directly with you and your ani­mal. It helps to be open-​​minded. Being focused on proof is putting the cart before the horse. If you wanted to know if some­one could drive a car, no amount of talk­ing about it would prove it to you. You would want to see them do it. Lis­ten to what I hear from your ani­mal first, then decide if it is true. Won­der­ing whether I’m for real or not is tak­ing focus off of the ani­mal. If you can lis­ten to what is com­ing from them first, and assess that for authen­tic­ity, it won’t mat­ter so much what I do. I am not the point here, this is about the con­nec­tion between you and your animal.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , ,

This arti­cle pre­vi­ously appeared in the jour­nal Species Link (Win­ter 2008 issue), the pro­fes­sional jour­nal of ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tors. The col­umn was Voice of the Expert, and I wrote this response to a ques­tion from an ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tor who was con­cerned because a client thought that ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tion could trig­ger seizures.

Dear Fel­low Practitioner:

I have spent some time study­ing brain dis­or­ders, both when I ran a neu­ro­feed­back clinic, and work­ing with a doc­tor doing brain maps (Quan­ti­ta­tive EEG type). Many of my patients had seizure dis­or­ders, both from known causes (e.g. head injuries) and from unknown causes. The Epilepsy Foun­da­tion says that 70% of seizures are from unknown causes. Also, even the most potent anti-​​seizure med­ica­tions are not 100% effec­tive, so the dog hav­ing “. . . been drugged for x-​​rays ear­lier in the day, so he almost couldn’t have a seizure” is not nec­es­sar­ily true. A typ­i­cal ani­mal anes­thetic for doing x-​​rays is not the drug of choice for pre­vent­ing seizures, and may have only a tiny effect on seizures, if at all. The med­ica­tion the dog received may only have caused a tem­po­rary sleep state, since dur­ing X-​​rays there are no inva­sive pro­ce­dures requir­ing deeper anes­the­sis. It would be good to check with the vet about this and get some informed clarification.

How a seizure looks elec­tri­cally: When you look at the brain map of a seizure, it shows chaotic and extra pow­er­ful (in volt­age) brain wave spikes. When you look at the brain map dur­ing con­ver­sa­tion of sev­eral types, both ver­bal, and non-​​verbal or tele­pathic con­ver­sa­tion, there is a dif­fer­ent pat­tern. The brain waves are finely mod­u­lated, with both rhyth­mic and vari­able aspects, but still orderly, both in ampli­tude and in phys­i­cal loca­tions in the brain. I hope this will help you under­stand how dis­sim­i­lar seizures and com­mu­ni­ca­tion are, in the brain. Also, mul­ti­ple seizures in a short period of time are not uncom­mon, and the first one that day hap­pened before your ses­sion. It is clear to me that the com­mu­ni­ca­tion and the seizure were co-​​incident, that is, hap­pen­ing at the same time, not causal.

How the brain is safe: The skull is a pretty good insu­la­tor. The dif­fer­ence in the volt­age of brain­waves inside the skull vs. what can be mea­sured out­side the skull is pretty big, about a thou­sand times more volts inside than out­side. But the amount of volt­age in sta­tic elec­tric­ity (the kind you get in your hair when you rub it with a bal­loon) is over 1 mil­lion times the volts inside your brain (which uses volt­age in a very del­i­cate and fine-​​tuned way). The sta­tic elec­tric­ity in your hair does not “pen­e­trate your brain”. So it is highly unlikely that any­thing you could do dur­ing com­mu­ni­ca­tion, with your brain, which is 1 mil­lion times less elec­tri­cally pow­er­ful than sta­tic elec­tric­ity, would be able to cause a seizure in the dog. [Please read more of this arti­cle by click­ing the link after the dona­tion button.]

© Denise Schultz 20o7

Dona­tions and con­nec­tions from the many to each other,
in even a tiny way, can cre­ate big shifts.

So please share Con­sider This . . .
with any­one else whom you want to con­sider these con­nec­tions and insights.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Theme Tweaker by Unreal
This site is protected by WP-CopyRightPro