<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Denise Schultz: Consider This . . . &#187; Animal Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://deniseschultz.com/tag/animal-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://deniseschultz.com</link>
	<description>con-siderare: to be with the stars ~^~^~ Going beyond the here and now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 01:48:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Animal Rights: Ownership or Guardianship? Part 1 of 2</title>
		<link>http://deniseschultz.com/2009/09/10/animal-rights-ownership-or-guardianship-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://deniseschultz.com/2009/09/10/animal-rights-ownership-or-guardianship-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denise Schultz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters To . . .]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Articles/Top 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$2 Donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Guardianship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal holistic healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denise Schultz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseschultz.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: This article originally appeared on Spirit Caat’s cat board. Dear Caat, It is not necessarily bad to be a guardian rather than an owner, except that it is a dilution of the legal relationship. I am not a lawyer, but as I understand it, the difficulty is when does the state (the government) get [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://deniseschultz.com/2009/09/10/animal-rights-ownership-or-guardianship-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Animal Rights: Ownership or Guardianship? Part 2 of 2</title>
		<link>http://deniseschultz.com/2009/09/10/animal-rights-ownership-or-guardianship-part-2-of-2/</link>
		<comments>http://deniseschultz.com/2009/09/10/animal-rights-ownership-or-guardianship-part-2-of-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Denise Schultz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Animal Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letters To . . .]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Articles/Top 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$2 Donations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Guardianship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal holistic healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denise Schultz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deniseschultz.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Caat, The basis they are using is that all alternative care is illegal, because it is only legal for a DVM vet to treat an animal, and they are so allopathically conservative that they believe DVM vets should have their licenses pulled for participating in alternative care. The AVMA is far more conservative than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://deniseschultz.com/2009/09/10/animal-rights-ownership-or-guardianship-part-2-of-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

