_

You are currently browsing articles tagged _.

This idea came to me because of a busi­ness class assign­ment, a mar­ket­ing map designed to choose and strate­gize my posi­tion in the mar­ket­place. But I want to step aside from mak­ing things work in the cur­rent mar­ket­place, and con­sider a dif­fer­ent path, cre­at­ing a new mar­ket­place.  I call it my mar­ket­ing manifesto.

Denise’s Mar­ket­ing Manifesto

 I don’t believe in the dual­is­tic think­ing of mar­ket­ing based on com­pe­ti­tion and scarcity. 

 I believe there are enough cus­tomers for every­one, and there is enough work for every­one.  I believe there are enough ideas to over­come any road­blocks.  If you lived in Ire­land a few hun­dred years ago, peat moss was the top of your tech­nol­ogy for heat­ing, and it was finite.  In other times and places it has been wood, now oil, now wind and solar.  Even if we can’t get by with those, we may learn to har­ness the power of wave motion in oceans and lakes, or some­thing bet­ter will be dis­cov­ered.  So I release the con­cept of scarcity, and the com­pe­ti­tion which it justifies.

 I don’t care how many peo­ple dis­agree with me, or who dis­agrees with me.  I don’t even care if I’m wrong, and com­pe­ti­tion is the only way to sur­vive and thrive in the marketplace. 

 I walk my path in this life intend­ing to con­tribute not just to the world I do live in, but intend­ing to con­tribute to the kind of world I want to live in.  I am not going to waste my time try­ing to sup­port a sys­tem whose time is past. 

 Do you want to know why we have wars on this planet?  It might be because our entire infra­struc­ture of mak­ing a liv­ing is based on a war metaphor, dual­ism, and scarcity. 

Com­pe­ti­tion = I win, you lose. 

 Maybe it is time for us to look beyond this.  I believe we have been in a very long era where it did not mat­ter how much ethics we had, if we did not have power.  I believe we are now mov­ing into an era where it will not mat­ter how much power we have if we do not have ethics. Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , , ,

Is it real? Yes, it is real. Ani­mals have told me phys­i­cal things that were con­firmed by X-​​rays, ultra­sounds, blood tests, and man­ual pal­pa­tion by vets, chi­ro­prac­tors, acu­puncturists, and oth­ers. Anatom­i­cal charts help me name phys­i­cal things the ani­mals show me, so the client can ask the vet about it. Things ani­mals have told me about life events, phys­i­cal objects in their envi­ron­ment, lay­out of house and land­scape, etc., have been con­firmed by clients.

What about proof? The best proof is for me to work directly with you and your ani­mal. It helps to be open-​​minded. Being focused on proof is putting the cart before the horse. If you wanted to know if some­one could drive a car, no amount of talk­ing about it would prove it to you. You would want to see them do it. Lis­ten to what I hear from your ani­mal first, then decide if it is true. Won­der­ing whether I’m for real or not is tak­ing focus off of the ani­mal. If you can lis­ten to what is com­ing from them first, and assess that for authen­tic­ity, it won’t mat­ter so much what I do. I am not the point here, this is about the con­nec­tion between you and your animal.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , ,

More than any­thing, I seek to present a com­pelling, mag­netic, high level of vibration.

Out here, among the stars, we have a lot to ‘con­sider’. I have been a writer since I was four, so I have fifty years of mus­ings (and ankle-​​biting) for you. I am a gen­er­al­ist who was raised by a gen­er­al­ist. I find spe­cial­iza­tion to be a toxic wrong turn in the evo­lu­tion of con­scious­ness. I am trained and inclined to look for the ‘meta level’ of under­stand­ing and to decon­struct con­ven­tional wis­dom in search of a bet­ter way.

 More than any­thing, I seek to present a com­pelling, mag­netic, high level of vibra­tion. I don’t live in a mate­r­ial uni­verse, I live in a vibra­tional uni­verse.  Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

This arti­cle pre­vi­ously appeared in the jour­nal Species Link (Win­ter 2008 issue), the pro­fes­sional jour­nal of ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tors. The col­umn was Voice of the Expert, and I wrote this response to a ques­tion from an ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tor who was con­cerned because a client thought that ani­mal com­mu­ni­ca­tion could trig­ger seizures.

Dear Fel­low Practitioner:

I have spent some time study­ing brain dis­or­ders, both when I ran a neu­ro­feed­back clinic, and work­ing with a doc­tor doing brain maps (Quan­ti­ta­tive EEG type). Many of my patients had seizure dis­or­ders, both from known causes (e.g. head injuries) and from unknown causes. The Epilepsy Foun­da­tion says that 70% of seizures are from unknown causes. Also, even the most potent anti-​​seizure med­ica­tions are not 100% effec­tive, so the dog hav­ing “. . . been drugged for x-​​rays ear­lier in the day, so he almost couldn’t have a seizure” is not nec­es­sar­ily true. A typ­i­cal ani­mal anes­thetic for doing x-​​rays is not the drug of choice for pre­vent­ing seizures, and may have only a tiny effect on seizures, if at all. The med­ica­tion the dog received may only have caused a tem­po­rary sleep state, since dur­ing X-​​rays there are no inva­sive pro­ce­dures requir­ing deeper anes­the­sis. It would be good to check with the vet about this and get some informed clarification.

How a seizure looks elec­tri­cally: When you look at the brain map of a seizure, it shows chaotic and extra pow­er­ful (in volt­age) brain wave spikes. When you look at the brain map dur­ing con­ver­sa­tion of sev­eral types, both ver­bal, and non-​​verbal or tele­pathic con­ver­sa­tion, there is a dif­fer­ent pat­tern. The brain waves are finely mod­u­lated, with both rhyth­mic and vari­able aspects, but still orderly, both in ampli­tude and in phys­i­cal loca­tions in the brain. I hope this will help you under­stand how dis­sim­i­lar seizures and com­mu­ni­ca­tion are, in the brain. Also, mul­ti­ple seizures in a short period of time are not uncom­mon, and the first one that day hap­pened before your ses­sion. It is clear to me that the com­mu­ni­ca­tion and the seizure were co-​​incident, that is, hap­pen­ing at the same time, not causal.

How the brain is safe: The skull is a pretty good insu­la­tor. The dif­fer­ence in the volt­age of brain­waves inside the skull vs. what can be mea­sured out­side the skull is pretty big, about a thou­sand times more volts inside than out­side. But the amount of volt­age in sta­tic elec­tric­ity (the kind you get in your hair when you rub it with a bal­loon) is over 1 mil­lion times the volts inside your brain (which uses volt­age in a very del­i­cate and fine-​​tuned way). The sta­tic elec­tric­ity in your hair does not “pen­e­trate your brain”. So it is highly unlikely that any­thing you could do dur­ing com­mu­ni­ca­tion, with your brain, which is 1 mil­lion times less elec­tri­cally pow­er­ful than sta­tic elec­tric­ity, would be able to cause a seizure in the dog. [Please read more of this arti­cle by click­ing the link after the dona­tion button.]

© Denise Schultz 20o7

Dona­tions and con­nec­tions from the many to each other,
in even a tiny way, can cre­ate big shifts.

So please share Con­sider This . . .
with any­one else whom you want to con­sider these con­nec­tions and insights.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Newer entries »

Theme Tweaker by Unreal
This site is protected by WP-CopyRightPro